Filing RTI Appeals: First Appeal and Second Appeal Process Guide

Content updated on

RTI Appeals: Your Path to Information After Denial

When your RTI application is denied, delayed, or receives an unsatisfactory response, the appeal process is your legal remedy. Understanding the appeal system empowers you to challenge government secrecy and fight for transparency.

When to File an Appeal

Grounds for First Appeal:

  • Complete Denial: All requested information refused
  • Partial Denial: Some information withheld without proper justification
  • No Response: 30 days passed without any reply (deemed denial)
  • Delayed Response: Response provided after statutory time limit
  • Unsatisfactory Response: Incomplete, vague, or evasive answers
  • Excessive Fees: Unreasonable fee demanded for information
  • Wrong Format: Information not provided in requested format without justification

Grounds for Second Appeal:

  • First Appeal Rejected: First Appellate Authority dismissed your appeal
  • First Appeal Delayed: No response to first appeal within 30 days
  • Unsatisfactory First Appeal: First Appellate Authority gave inadequate response

First Appeal Process

Timeline for Filing

  • 30 days from receiving denial/unsatisfactory response
  • 30 days from expiry of response time if no reply received
  • 90 days in exceptional circumstances with sufficient cause

First Appellate Authority

Who it is:

  • Officer senior to the Public Information Officer (PIO)
  • Designated by each public authority
  • Usually Joint Secretary level or equivalent

How to Identify: Check the public authority’s website or contact the PIO for First Appellate Authority details.

First Appeal Format

Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of RTI Act, 2005

To: The First Appellate Authority
[Department Name and Address]

Application Details:

  • RTI Application Date: [Date]
  • RTI Application Number: [If available]
  • Information Sought: [Brief description]
  • PIO Response Date: [Date or mention “No response received”]

Grounds for Appeal: [Specific reasons why the PIO’s response is inadequate]

Relief Sought: I request the First Appellate Authority to:

  1. Direct the PIO to provide complete information sought
  2. [Any specific directions needed]

Public Interest Statement: [Brief explanation of why disclosure serves public interest]

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Date]

First Appeal Strategy Tips

Strengthen Your Appeal:

  1. Be Specific: Address exact exemptions claimed and why they don’t apply
  2. Cite Precedents: Reference relevant court judgments or Information Commission orders
  3. Public Interest: Clearly articulate why disclosure serves public interest
  4. Evidence: Attach copies of original application and PIO response
  5. Legal Arguments: Challenge misinterpretation of exemption provisions

Second Appeal Process

Timeline for Filing

  • 90 days from receiving first appeal decision
  • 90 days from expiry of first appeal response time if no reply

Second Appellate Authority

State Information Commission (for state government departments) Central Information Commission (for central government departments)

Preparing for Information Commission

Commission Powers:

  • Order disclosure of information
  • Impose penalties on officials for violations
  • Issue guidelines for better RTI implementation
  • Recommend disciplinary action against non-compliant officers

Commission Proceedings:

  • Formal Hearing: You can appear in person or through representative
  • Evidence Presentation: Present documents and legal arguments
  • Cross-Examination: Question department representatives about denial
  • Final Order: Binding decision that can be challenged only in High Court

Second Appeal Format

Subject: Second Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act, 2005

To: [State/Central] Information Commission

Case Background:

  • Original RTI Application: [Date and details]
  • PIO Response: [Summary of response/denial]
  • First Appeal: [Date filed and outcome]
  • Grounds for Second Appeal: [Why first appeal decision is incorrect]

Legal Arguments: [Detailed analysis of why exemptions don’t apply, citing legal precedents]

Relief Sought:

  1. Set aside the First Appellate Authority’s decision
  2. Direct disclosure of all requested information
  3. Impose penalty on responsible officers for violations
  4. [Any other specific relief]

Documents Enclosed:

  1. Copy of original RTI application
  2. PIO response/denial
  3. First appeal and response
  4. Relevant legal precedents

Public Interest Justification: [Detailed explanation of public interest in disclosure]

Common Appeal Strategies

Challenging Security Exemptions

  • Demand specific harm assessment, not general security claims
  • Cite precedents showing similar information disclosed elsewhere
  • Argue for partial disclosure with sensitive details redacted

Challenging Commercial Confidence

  • Demonstrate information relates to public expenditure, not commercial secrets
  • Show public interest outweighs claimed commercial harm
  • Prove information not genuinely confidential

Challenging Investigation Exemption

  • Verify investigation is actually ongoing
  • Argue for disclosure of concluded investigations
  • Seek non-sensitive procedural information

RTI Blog Legal Network:

  • Email: appeals@rtiblog.in
  • Legal Consultation: Free initial consultation for appeal cases
  • Draft Review: Appeal draft review and improvement suggestions
  • Hearing Support: Representation at Information Commission hearings

Key Judgment Categories:

  • Supreme Court RTI Judgments: Constitutional interpretation of transparency rights
  • High Court Decisions: State-level RTI implementation issues
  • Information Commission Orders: Sector-specific disclosure patterns
  • International Precedents: Comparative transparency law from other democracies

Success Factors for Appeals

Documentation Excellence

  • Complete Record: Maintain chronological file of all correspondence
  • Legal Citations: Reference relevant judgments and commission orders
  • Public Interest: Articulate clear public benefit from disclosure
  • Specific Arguments: Address each exemption claim individually

Strategic Considerations

  • Test Case Potential: Consider broader precedent impact
  • Media Coverage: Strategic publicity for important cases
  • Coalition Building: Coordinate with other transparency advocates
  • Follow-up Enforcement: Monitor compliance with positive orders

After Winning Your Appeal

Ensuring Compliance

  • Timeline Monitoring: Track compliance with Information Commission orders
  • Quality Assessment: Verify disclosed information is complete and accurate
  • Penalty Enforcement: Follow up on penalty orders against non-compliant officials

Sharing Success

  • Precedent Building: Share successful appeals to help other applicants
  • Case Study Development: Document strategy for similar future cases
  • Advocacy Impact: Use success to advocate for systemic transparency improvements

Constitutional Challenge Option

When Appeals Fail: If both first and second appeals fail on legal grounds, consider constitutional challenge in High Court or Supreme Court questioning:

  • Misinterpretation of RTI Act provisions
  • Systematic denial patterns violating constitutional transparency rights
  • Need for stronger transparency enforcement mechanisms

Getting Started with Your Appeal

Immediate Steps:

  1. Review Denial Carefully: Identify specific exemptions claimed
  2. Research Precedents: Find similar cases where information was disclosed
  3. Draft Strong Appeal: Use our templates and legal arguments
  4. Submit Timely: Don’t miss 30-day deadline for first appeal

Contact for Appeal Support:

Remember Your Rights

Appeals Are Your Right: Every RTI denial can and should be challenged if it lacks proper justification. The appeal process is designed to correct PIO errors and enforce transparency.

Systemic Impact: Your individual appeal contributes to broader transparency advocacy. Every successful appeal strengthens RTI implementation for all citizens.

This appeal guide incorporates latest legal developments and Information Commission practices. Updated regularly based on user feedback and case outcomes. Last updated: November 2024